The American secretary of state – the nation's highest diplomat – "does not get up every morning and ask how things are in New Zealand", said Josiah Beeman, American ambassador to New Zealand, 1994-99.

But lots of American diplomats did ask those questions because they were stationed here or had New Zealand responsibilities in Washington, DC, or places like Canberra.

Prime Minister Robert Muldoon in the Oval Office. He liked US nuclear ship visits because he could send the police out to "clobber" peaceniks, according to former US diplomats.

Happily, what these lower-ranked American diplomats thought about New Zealand has been preserved in the Oral History Collection of the Association of Diplomatic Studies and Training in Washington.

It's here we learn, for example, that prime minister David Lange "did not have any core principles", in the view of Paul Cleveland, US ambassador to New Zealand, 1986-89.
"Our meetings were pleasant enough", said Cleveland, but "we never trusted him."

Of the more than 2000 interviews in the archive, New Zealand is discussed in about 50.

These date from 1949-99 and by far the most common questions asked of these former diplomats concerned nuclear-armed ships, which dominated NZ-US relations in the 1980s but which had earlier origins.

"New Zealand, beginning in the '60s, fancied itself as 'clean, green and nuclear free', said Alphonse La Porta, deputy chief of mission, Wellington, 1987-91. "We used to say, only half in jest, that New Zealand was the westward extension of the protest movements in California. If all the leftists in 'La La Land' wanted a nice haven to go to, they'd just go to New Zealand."

Prime Minister David Lange, left, shares a light moment with US Ambassador to New Zealand Paul Cleveland. The ambassador didn't trust the PM.

NZ PM Robert Muldoon used to ask the US to send nuclear ships to this country, according to Anne Martindell,​ US ambassador, 1979-81. "I need a ship, I need a ship", he would say. "He wanted one so he could send the police out to clobber the protesters. This would build up his constituency."

"He in effect ordered us to bring [a] ship into New Zealand as a show of contempt for the 'peaceniks' … we had serious reservations about the wisdom of doing so," said Cleveland.

"Muldoon was a tremendously shrewd politician," said Richard Dols, political counsellor in Wellington, 1977-81. "He could con the shoes off anybody and he certainly did con the shoes off Ambassador [Armistead] Selden."

US diplomats wanted to send this guided missile destroyer, USS Buchanan, on a ship visit to New Zealand. Lange declined the offer, setting off the biggest and longest rift in NZ-US relations.

Ambassador Anne Martindell "never even got within speaking distance of the [NZ] Government", Dols said. "Before she left Washington, she was invited to the New Zealand Embassy for a dinner at which Muldoon was present. They sat next to each other. Muldoon liked to tipple a little heavily. Somewhere in the conversation he told Anne, who was somewhat of a feminist, 'I don't like lady politicians'.


"She was highly offended. What did she do but tell … the New York Times [about] that little episode. Muldoon reacted, of course, vehemently because Labour then began castigating him in Parliament …

"So Muldoon in effect let it be known that he was going to have nothing to do with her, period. And he kept that promise."

Muldoon was voted out in 1984 and the Labour Party under Lange came to power. The new Government implemented a policy that banned nuclear-propelled ships and ships carrying nuclear weapons from NZ waters. Lange later passed legislation to this effect. The US was furious.

"We read off to [Lange] the sanctions that would be taken against New Zealand if they persisted in their policy," said John Glassman, mid-1980s country director, Australia and New Zealand affairs, Washington.

"Lange kept staring over our heads, we couldn't understand what was happening. Lange was a very fat man, he probably weighed about 250-300 pounds and we couldn't figure out why he kept staring over our heads. We turned around and there was a plate of pastries on the shelf."

"Lange [was] a fascinating character … He was one of the most witty men I have ever seen," said James Morton, political counsellor, Wellington, 1984-87. "One time he was asked about [US ambassador] Monroe Brown's latest outrageous statement … Brown was a cattle rancher, but he was also a horse breeder and he had a horse that he ran in the Melbourne Cup … The horse's name was 'Lack of Reason'.

US Secretary of State George Shultz, left, with Lange. The US should have waited for "better moment" to push the nuclear ships issue, according to a former diplomat.

Back to the press conference … someone said, "Prime Minister Lange, what do you think of Monroe Brown's latest comments …" He said, "Well, what do you think about a guy who names a horse after his country's foreign policy?"

"Well, [NZ] stuck to their guns [on nuclear-armed ships]," said William Lenderking, USIA public affairs officer 1984-86. "But the sky didn't fall. New Zealanders are marvellous people and they have a lovely country, but they also tend to be a little self-righteous and they saw themselves as leading a crusade to keep nuclear weapons away from the South Pacific, and beyond."

"We reached an agreement with the Australians," said Glassman. [They] were pushing us very hard to take action against New Zealanders because the Australian Labor Party felt that this could be very contagious within their own party if New Zealand policy was allowed to stand without sanction.

"It was agreed that we would suspend New Zealand from the Anzus alliance."

"I'm afraid my hero, Secretary [of State, George] Shultz, mishandled it," said Phillip Mayhew, Australia and New Zealand affairs, Washington, 1988-89. Before this all blew up, we used to have regular consultations with the Australians and New Zealanders …

"When Shultz arrived for those talks in 1986, New Zealand had just elected a Labour government, and Shultz was pushing them to promise that they wouldn't change their policy on this [nuclear ships] issue.

"It was just the wrong moment to do so. They had just come into power and they were completely preoccupied with an internal crisis of their own because they were facing a sudden and major foreign currency crisis, and it was exactly the wrong moment to push them to make a complex foreign policy decision like that.

"But we did, and they got their backs up and said no, and we reacted badly and it all went rapidly downhill. Looking back later, we wondered why in the world we hadn't just let it wait for a better moment."

"I have a private view of New Zealand," said Arthur Hummel, deputy assistant secretary in Washington, 1972-75. "They were a group of people who were exceedingly ignorant about world affairs. They were the country cousins of the English-speaking world. Their views were naive, uninformed, and parochial, but they were pleasant people. There wasn't a broad-based brain in the whole bunch."

"New Zealanders are appealing people, and their diplomats were very professional and sophisticated," said Keith McCormick, political counsellor, Wellington, 1991-94. Their foreign ministry was also very efficient. They were always well-informed."

Article: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/115390176/undiplomatic-what-us-diplomats-really-thought-about-nz
Note from Nighthawk.NZ:

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive
 
Powered by OrdaSoft!